Two recent medical studies discovered that American government officials experiencing symptoms of Havana syndrome did not exhibit any visible physical harm or change.
Two research papers released on Monday by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded by the federal government investigated brain scans and blood markers, along with medical evaluations of hearing, sight, hand-eye coordination, mental function, and postural control.
Two studies, both published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, did not find any noteworthy variations between a group that received no treatment and a group of approximately 80 current or former US government officials who suffer from a collection of symptoms, often causing disability, called Havana syndrome. This syndrome was named after the location where the first reported cases occurred among diplomats and intelligence personnel in 2015.
After this, numerous incidents have been documented, predominantly involving American diplomats stationed in foreign countries. This has sparked speculation that they were intentionally harmed by a previously unseen weapon using focused energy, possibly by an adversarial nation. Official investigations and declarations regarding what the government has labeled “anomalous health incidents” have provided differing evaluations on the likelihood that a weapon was utilized.
A legal representative for multiple individuals affected by Havana syndrome stated that the examinations did not reveal any new information about the occurrence and accused the manner in which the research was carried out of raising ethical concerns.
The neuroimaging study by NIH revealed that there were no notable discrepancies in the brain’s structural or functional imaging results between individuals who reported AHIs and those who were matched as control participants, even after taking into account multiple comparisons.
However, it was stated: “Although this study did not detect a neuroimaging pattern of brain injury within this AHI group, it does not diminish the severity of the clinical condition.”
Individuals with Havana syndrome have experienced persistent and severe headaches, dizziness, nausea, and exhaustion, which has rendered them unable to carry out their duties in certain instances.
The second NIH research found that there were no major discrepancies between people who reported AHIs and those who were matched as control participants in terms of most clinical, research, and biomarker data. The exceptions were for objective and self-reported measures of dizziness, as well as symptoms of exhaustion, post traumatic stress, and depression.
Lawyer Mark Zaid, who is based in Washington DC and is representing various individuals affected by Havana syndrome, stated that the recent studies provided minimal novel findings.
Zaid stated that although the studies do not provide evidence, it does not discredit the theory that a foreign enemy is using directed energy to harm US citizens and their families.
He mentioned having ethical reservations about the NIH studies, specifically regarding the level of voluntariness involved.
He stated that some of his clients were informed that they had to take part in the research in order to receive treatment for their injuries. This is a major mistake in the medical field, where informed consent is highly valued.
Source: theguardian.com
