Phillipson believes that getting rid of the non-domiciled tax status would be shameful for the Conservative party.

Phillipson believes that getting rid of the non-domiciled tax status would be shameful for the Conservative party.

Bridget Phillipson, a member of the Labour shadow cabinet, stated that if the Tories were to enforce the Labour proposal of eliminating non-dom status, it would result in a severe humiliation for them.

The abolition of the status, which gives generous tax breaks to some of the UK’s richest residents, has long been one of Labour’s headline policies, but the chancellor, Jeremy Hunt, is understood to be considering announcing a similar move in this week’s budget.

On Sky News’s Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips, Phillipson expressed that abolishing non-dom status would result in a complete humiliation, since Conservative cabinet members have spent significant time rejecting this concept.

“If they were to take action, it would prove that Labour is spearheading the debate on ideas in our nation.”

Foreign nationals residing in the UK, but with their official residence located overseas, can use non-dom status to exempt themselves from paying UK taxes on their income and capital gains earned outside of the country. Akshata Murty, the wife of Rishi Sunak, has previously benefitted from non-domiciled status.

Bridget Phillipson.

Display the picture in full screen mode.

There are reports that Hunt is exploring various options for prolonging the windfall tax on oil and gas companies, which is one of the main policies of the Labour party.

On Sunday, Hunt announced intentions to decrease the size of the civil service and minimize bureaucratic regulations in order to generate more income. During an interview with Sky News, he expressed contempt towards equality and diversity efforts within the civil service.

Hunt expressed that he believes it is the responsibility of all bosses in the public sector to shatter glass ceilings. However, he is unsure about the effectiveness of offering large salaries specifically for this purpose, as stated during an interview on Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips.

Overall, I believe it is necessary for the civil service to go back to its pre-Covid staffing levels. While there was understandably a significant increase during the pandemic, it is important to return to our previous staffing levels.

Our goal is to improve public services, which doesn’t necessarily require increased spending. In some cases, it may involve reducing expenses and finding more efficient ways to manage them.

During the most recent autumn statement, the government declared intentions to limit the amount of civil servants to levels seen in 2019 for the duration of the upcoming spending review, resulting in a reduction of 66,000 positions.

Revised: According to Hunt, Wednesday’s budget proposal for the spring season aims to be “cautious and sensible” in order to promote long-term economic growth. He also noted that countries with lower tax rates tend to experience more rapid growth, referencing nations in North America and Asia.

Skip over the advertisement for the newsletter.

The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), a left-leaning thinktank, reports that Germany and France have above-average disposable incomes compared to the UK, despite having higher tax rates. Additionally, many nations with high taxation have experienced significant growth in real wages in recent years.

Hunt made it clear that he would not consider borrowing money to finance tax cuts. He stressed that the upcoming spring budget would not include any deceptive methods, and that it would instead demonstrate a plan for gradually implementing tax reductions.

Hunt stated that all conservatives hold the belief that the state is morally obligated to minimize the amount of money taken from individuals, as it rightfully belongs to those who have earned it.

However, it is commonly understood that reducing taxes by borrowing is not fiscally responsible, as it simply leaves the burden to be paid by future generations.

In the autumn statement, there was a pivotal moment when we decreased the national insurance rate by 2p.

The chancellor informed the Sunday Telegraph that the economic predictions provided by the Office for Budget Responsibility last week did not align with their expectations, resulting in a smaller financial cushion than anticipated.

Source: theguardian.com