“Points deductions in the later part of the season and the impact on the Premier League’s football fans – this is the reason why we are all passionate about the sport.” – Max Rushden

“Points deductions in the later part of the season and the impact on the Premier League’s football fans – this is the reason why we are all passionate about the sport.” – Max Rushden

I

This is the ideal scenario: the current standings constantly shifting on the last day. The championship and demotion being decided until the very end. Switch to Soccer Saturday (on a Sunday, pardon the slightly outdated reference).

“We are headed to the court of arbitration for sport. A points deduction has been announced, but for whom, Chris Kamara?” “I am unsure, Jeff. Has there been one? I must have overlooked it.” … “Chris, have you not been paying attention?” “I have not.” … Kammy chimed in, “Actually, you are correct. I saw Evangelos Marinakis clenching his fists at the judge, but I assumed he had already won his appeal.”

Sky faces a challenging choice – should they assign Peter Drury to cover the visit of Wolves to Anfield or send him to Premier League HQ to report on Manchester City’s 115 charges? Drury starts off his soliloquy by quoting Harper Lee, who believed that fairness should be guaranteed in a courtroom. However, the important question on this exceptionally exciting Super Sunday is, can you face the truth?

The two teams will be led by Erling Haaland and Lord Pannick. Cut to a split screen of the two men walking confidently towards the camera, one with Nordic hair and the other with a barrister wig. They then stand with folded arms and smile together. Dave Jones asks, “Who do you think will be panicking later, Graeme Souness?” Suddenly, there is breaking news that the court case has been postponed for 25 years, according to Sky Sports. Updates will be provided as they come.

Gary Lineker shares a video of the Match of the Day green room where Ian Wright can be seen watching the Arsenal v Everton match intently. Arsenal must win while Everton must settle for a draw and hope for a favorable outcome in their appeal against the second points deduction they received at the end of March (note that this is just speculation and this article has no hidden motives).

Alan Irwin, with his right index finger pressed to his ear and his head turned towards the right, is standing outside Premier League HQ while attempting to hear what Julian Warren is asking. In the studio, Lee Hendrie is observing the events and discussing PSR case law with Clinton Morrison, while purple dildos surround them.

In the final outcome, Nottingham Forest, Everton, and Luton are demoted, while Nottingham Forest, Everton, and Luton all stay – with the possibility of appeals being considered during uneventful matches in the group stage of the Euros.

This is the reason we were all drawn to the game. Forest is currently in the relegation zone after receiving a four-point penalty this week. Meanwhile, in the next three weeks, Everton will determine if they will face an extra penalty in addition to the six points they have already lost.

Forest exceeded their budget by £34.5m, but behaved well, resulting in a four-point penalty. On the other hand, Everton went over their budget by £19.5m, but their conduct was bothersome, leading to a six-point penalty. Even though Forest’s overspending was greater, they did not suffer as much as Everton did – however, this is due to their lower budget constraints as they had just come from the EFL.

It is not surprising that supporters are feeling confused and angry about the situation. However, the question of who to direct this anger towards is a separate issue. As Barney Ronay noted this week, the owners were aware of the rules and agreed to them, yet in the case of Forest, they deliberately violated them and even admitted to the Premier League that they were doing so at the same time.

Forest contended that allowing newly promoted clubs without parachute payments to compete would be exceedingly challenging, perhaps even unattainable, and would ultimately harm the integrity and competitiveness of the Premier League. However, teams like Brighton and Brentford have proven that it can be achieved.

Ignore the advertisement for the newsletter

There are valid concerns regarding the rules on profitability and sustainability. It would make sense to align with the transfer window. The entire case involving Forest hinges on the timing of the sale of “Player A” to Spurs (I am unable to determine who this was, but it could potentially be Teddy Sheringham or Andy Reid). If the sale had occurred two months earlier, no deduction would have been imposed. It is logical to seek the highest possible price for a player.

Everton’s Ben Godfrey reacts after defeat by Manchester UnitedView image in fullscreen

Is it feasible to have all point deductions processed during the offseason? If all parties agree to this and are aware that any errors made during the current season will result in deductions during the summer, could this prevent legal action from clubs who are relegated or do not qualify for Europe due to delayed point deductions?

It is unlikely that the answer to this question is yes. When money becomes a factor, the dynamic within the football community, like many other communities, becomes more complex. Everyone becomes focused on their own interests – a desire that is likely shared by fans. Clubs also have a duty to their staff, and when a team is demoted to the Championship, many people lose their jobs.

There is a topic of debate regarding whether PSR or FFP effectively supports the long-term sustainability of clubs or simply maintains the current state. Your perspective on this matter may be influenced by the team you root for and their financial resources. However, it is necessary to have measures in place to prevent clubs from taking risks and potentially endangering their future. And if you believe rules are necessary, then it is unfair to criticize the Premier League or the EFL for attempting to implement them. This issue is likely more complex than we realize, and legal professionals have a vested interest in taking their time to address it.

Moving onto the regulatory body is essential, particularly considering the criticisms voiced by those involved. However, the extent of its authority will remain unknown until it is fully implemented. Who exactly will serve on it? Perhaps retired athletes and a former official? Or possibly individuals like Steve Dale, Sheikh Mansour, or Nasser al-Khelaifi who typically hold these positions. It is imperative that this entity possesses the ability to regulate because for supporters of clubs like Reading, Torquay, and Rochdale, the focus is on survival rather than the inconvenience of having to scroll past the Premier League to view their team’s placement.

Source: theguardian.com